Trump's AI Action Plan: Global Dominance or Federal Overreach?
The Trump administration has unveiled its AI Action Plan, aiming for global dominance in artificial intelligence. The plan, however, has raised concerns about potential overreach and federal interference with state regulations.
The plan's first pillar is to dismantle 'onerous' federal and state regulations, particularly those related to AI. It targets state regulations through two main strategies: federal funding and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is directed to evaluate whether state AI regulations interfere with its obligations and authorities under the Communications Act of 1934.
The plan's broad scope and undefined terms have sparked worries about potential political abuse. It requires Executive Order and agency action, providing opportunities for public input and course-correction. However, implementing its directives may raise significant legal questions, including potential violations of the Constitution's Spending Clause and the FCC's authority under the Communications Act.
Congress is urged to conduct oversight hearings to ensure agencies stay within their legal and constitutional boundaries and preserve state authority to address AI harms. Several congressional committees have jurisdiction over AI issues and should hold hearings featuring testimony from state officials working to combat AI harms.
The Trump administration's AI Action Plan seeks to promote AI research and innovation while limiting federal agencies' overreach. However, its broad scope and potential interference with state regulations have raised concerns that require careful consideration and oversight.
